Think about this. Why developer accept the heavy cost of learn something like C++ or even python, yet in the case of a language of SQL suddenly they think: No,

Think about this. Why developer accept the heavy cost of learn something like C++ or even python, yet in the case of a language of SQL suddenly they think: No, is toooo hard! Is worst when they refuse to use a relational engine, yet, use a NOSQL and re-implement, badly, what a relational engine give. Like the well know quote about lisp: http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?GreenspunsTenthRuleOfProgramming http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?GreenspunsTenthRuleOfProgramming Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad-hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of CommonLisp. Is possible to say: Any sufficiently complicated data manipulation program contains an ad-hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of a relational engine. ------- Is clear that SQL is not very good, but use a database engine and know enough to do it well is WAY EASIER than learn C++, python or Javascript. Like a lot!