6 ms·
Oh well, another reason to switch to heroin. The FBI can't access your dealer's records. Seriously though, this is bad for privacy, bad for addicts, and bad f
by onetwotree 10y ago
Oh well, another reason to switch to heroin. The FBI can't access your dealer's records.
Seriously though, this is bad for privacy, bad for addicts, and bad for patients who need painkillers.
Who thinks of this shit? Aging drug warriors I suppose.
- kazinator 10y ago> The FBI can't access your dealer's records. Oh yes they can; the very reason he's even retaining them is to have some plea-bargaining material.
- tbyehl 10y ago"Are you taking notes of a criminal conspiracy? What are you thinking?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBdGOrcUEg8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBdGOrcUEg8
- ryanlol 10y agoUnless you regularly buy kilos from your dealer, those records aren't exactly plea-bargaining material.
- lsiebert 10y agoI think if you sell to famous/powerful people, it can be. At least high class prostitution seems to work that way from what I've read.
- onetwotree 10y agoUm, dealers don't get plea bargins for turning in people below them on the supply chain, they get plea bargains for turning in people above them.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jrapdx3 10y agoBad for many people requiring medications for a wide array of conditions. It is completely wrong that warrantless searches are permitted. I hope more states follow Oregon's example and defend the privacy of medical care. It's extremely disheartening to find out about the Obama administration's position. There are so many problems in the country that urgently need to be addressed, but instead the DEA is mucking around in prescription records which deserve protection. We should indeed raise a stink about this foul situation. Most of all it's time to abolish the worthless DEA.