Another way of looking at this is by questioning why it is so expensive for people to obtain redress in civil matters in the first place. If Hogan had not benef

Another way of looking at this is by questioning why it is so expensive for people to obtain redress in civil matters in the first place. If Hogan had not benefited from Thiel's interest and otherwise could not afford to mount his case, then it appears that any transgressions against him would simply stand. Where's the justice in that?