I think this is hogwash to say that funding another person's litigation is somehow wrong, or abuse when in this case the plaintiff actually won. Without it, th

I think this is hogwash to say that funding another person's litigation is somehow wrong, or abuse when in this case the plaintiff actually won. Without it, the plaintiff might not have been able to launch a case at all, which means is that rich defendants like Gawker or even Scientology would be untouchable by regular people who couldn't afford to lawyer-up. I'm happy about the outcome.