4 ms·
I wouldn't be too quick to say it's too expensive. My set up is not dissimilar to your own. I'm comfortable working on the command line, using s3cmd to sync th
by bennylope 10y ago
I wouldn't be too quick to say it's too expensive.
My set up is not dissimilar to your own. I'm comfortable working on the command line, using s3cmd to sync the site, modifying bucket policies, etc. Once you know those things - or if you enjoy learning them - it's all pretty trivial, but if you don't... well don't underestimate the hassle for someone who doesn't know this stuff. I'd think it a waste to pay $13/mo for what I'm happy to throw in an S3 bucket, but that's 3 venti lattes for someone not to have to deal with any of it. It's not the file storage they're charging for.
- juandazapata 10y agoI agree with you. It's just too expensive for me, maybe not for others. In the end they are just tools, and you should use whatever fits you better.
- cfjedimaster 10y agoAlso remember that's 13 bucks to get custom SSL, redirects, etc. If you have simple pages w/o the need of https, it costs nothing.
- djsumdog 10y agoI think that SSL is just for surge.sh subdomains. I didn't see anything about lets-encrypt SSL on custom domains.
- g4k 10y agoFor low volume projects it is clearly too expensive. I prefer a volume based pricing model like 5apps is offering it: https://5apps.com/deploy/plans https://5apps.com/deploy/plans