3 ms·
If you're attacking the people involved for their social and political views, you may as well ask what the views are of the people involved in Gawker as well.
by CM30 10y ago
If you're attacking the people involved for their social and political views, you may as well ask what the views are of the people involved in Gawker as well.
http://nypost.com/2016/03/09/gawker-editors-line-a-sex-tape-of-a-4-year-old/ http://nypost.com/2016/03/09/gawker-editors-line-a-sex-tape-...
And there are way more examples out there. Like Sam Biddle and his bullying comments, or various disturbing anti male comments by Jezebel, or various comments about wishing horrible things on their opponents.
This is not a black and white situation.
- keepper 10y agoIt isn't an "attack". Look, I'm not trying to change minds, I'm hoping people step back for a second, and see this for what it is. Just another thin skinned person with way too much financial power getting his way. Pointing out the attack on Gawker is wrong, does not mean I condone Gawkers' behavior. That's pretty much the definition of seeing the world in the shades of gray/color it actually is.