8 ms·
The web I want: 1) One that isn't completely dominated by advertising. 2) One that isn't dominated by proprietary software, that encourages users to participa
by arca_vorago 10y ago
The web I want:
1) One that isn't completely dominated by advertising.
2) One that isn't dominated by proprietary software, that encourages users to participate in FOSS.
3) One focused on data. Part of the problem of javascript, so uneeded in most cases.
4) More on javascript, how about one where each page doesn't load 30 scripts from alternate domains? Even the major new sites do this, and it makes me hate them.
5) One where ISP's don't hand over browsing information to anyone with a dollar or a badge without a warrant.
6) One where VPN's and other privacy centered providers learn how to build systems that don't keep logs and are built with privacy as a first class citizen.
7) Not last, and certainly not least, I mostly want a web that encourages and grows the freedom of thought, speech, and discussion that is and was such a fundamental part of the origins of the internet in the first place. It seems increasingly marginalized on the modern web. The beauty of communications mediums is the power it gives the formerly powerless, but I think the oligarchy has recognized this threat and this is why the internet is going to be increasingly a target of bad legislation written by corrupt "representatives". Beware cries of hate speech or any other attempts at censoring "for the greater good".
Just a few of things I want in web off the top of my head. As for this Mozilla page, I think if we think about the four freedoms and fundamental principles behind them, user control really has to be the starting point. You can't have privacy if the user can't turn off spywidgetX. You can't have freedom if the user can't Y.
Once again, I feel like one day, if we don't destroy ourselves as a species, we will look back and wonder why it took people so long to understand why RMS is and was right. The four freedoms are fundamental to the web I want, and while I often get a lot of hate on HN for being so pro RMS/GPL, I think if more people took the time to understand the issues they would tend to agree.
edit: One where strong theoretical and practical encryption is for everyone, and isn't vilified by the government.
- tangue 10y agoWhy is this downvoted ? Shouldn't we share these values as hackers ?
- chc 10y agoAs a hacker, I appreciate the platform the Web offers for code. So I don't see why you'd necessarily expect me to agree with a complaint about the ability to write code for the Web. (I didn't downvote, though. I just think it's strange to expect universal agreement with Javascript Luddism among hackers.)
- mindcrime 10y agoI don't see it as a complaint about the ability to write code for the Web, but rather a complaint about they way some people choose to exercise that ability. Seriously, it is crap that the Web feels slower today than it did in 1998, despite gigahertz of advances in processing power, many multiples more CPU cores, much larger pipes, SSD's, etc... And a lot of that is exactly because pages are loaded down with so much crap (ad networks, tracking scripts, etc.) that must load.
- bigmanwalter 10y agoIn my view, the worst part about including javascript everywhere on the net is that it limits scraping to the big guys who can afford to run all sites through a js interpreter. Google, Facebook, et al. And making them, even moreso than they are already, the de facto gatekeepers to information.
- ams6110 10y agoI don't perceive "Javascript Luddism" in GP's post, more annoyance with the abusive and gratuitous use of Javascript so prevalant today.
- tangue 10y agoCouldn't have said it better. I have javascript activated and will continue to do so. But when my CPU fan sound like an airplane because of some slider or poorly written code ... [Out of subject] I'm curious how many nuclear and coal plants are required for web browsing related tasks today ...
- bigmanwalter 10y agoamen