2 ms·
Governments aren't children. Starving a child is horrible no matter what infraction they're guilty of... both because it's a child, and the infractions are mino
by NoMoreNicksLeft 10y ago
Governments aren't children. Starving a child is horrible no matter what infraction they're guilty of... both because it's a child, and the infractions are minor anyway (eating candy).
A government isn't a child, deserves none of the same considerations. And it's crime is mass murder.
I'm happy to see it starve, I'm obligated to try to starve it.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- colanderman 10y agoYou entirely missed my point. Replace "child" with "garden" and "sweets" with "weeds". If you try to starve the weeds taking over your garden by not watering your garden, you'll have only weeds left. You need to attack the root of the problem, be it literally roots, or by voting warmongers out of office.
- NoMoreNicksLeft 10y agoI'm ok with not having a government left. It's a murderous government. "Drone bombs on hospitals" murderous. You can't vote warmongers out of office. There are no such candidates.