If her intentions were pure, then she should have worked through the system to drive change, not sidestepped it in an effort to avoid her duties as a civil serv

If her intentions were pure, then she should have worked through the system to drive change, not sidestepped it in an effort to avoid her duties as a civil servant appointed to represent the citizens of our country. She's never once said she did this to increase her security. If that was her motivation, why hasn't it been her defense of the act this whole time? Maybe I'm just a tinfoil, but it seems much more likely that this was done in order to prevent information from legal public record keeping, than it was because she was an OpSec and ComSec wizard.