In the old days, if you used torrents to distribute p2p you'd get sued. If you used someone else's website to distribute, the website would get sued. Now, peop

In the old days, if you used torrents to distribute p2p you'd get sued. If you used someone else's website to distribute, the website would get sued. Now, people use YouTube to distribute but people get sued, not YouTube. Why is this? Morally, and for a purpose of balancing powers, it should be the big guy that gets sued, not the individuals.