4 ms·
I think that's ambiguous enough that it's probably not infringing on their trademark. That doesn't prevent them from saying it does though. Disclaimer: I'm not
by tbgvi 17y ago
I think that's ambiguous enough that it's probably not infringing on their trademark. That doesn't prevent them from saying it does though.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer!
- yashodhan 17y agoIANAL either, maybe somebody with a bit of expertise in the field can chime in?
- petercooper 17y agoLast year I bought devvit.com/net/org for a site I'm working on (has a new name now) and after doing a lot of polling, enough people thought it was too close to risk. Only anecdotal, but devvit is far less similar than rddd.it, and it only takes a mere thought for a trademark holder to try and have a go..
- yashodhan 17y agoWhat was the intended purpose of devvit? Social aggregator for developers?