3 ms·
Is there any source for this that's less dodgy? Is it any different from the known weaknesses in the key derivation for AES-256?
by carey 10y ago
Is there any source for this that's less dodgy? Is it any different from the known weaknesses in the key derivation for AES-256?
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoYeah, that site didn't impress me, either. If true, though, this is huge.
- duskwuff 10y agoEvery bit as huge, I'm sure, as some of the other perfectly believable news this site has broken, such as: http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-the-moon-landings/ http://yournewswire.com/stanley-kubrick-confesses-to-faking-... http://yournewswire.com/us-senate-admit-that-chemtrails-are-real-and-killing-humans/ http://yournewswire.com/us-senate-admit-that-chemtrails-are-... http://yournewswire.com/queen-elizabeth-ordered-bin-laden-plane-crash-in-911-coverup/ http://yournewswire.com/queen-elizabeth-ordered-bin-laden-pl... http://yournewswire.com/are-you-being-attacked-by-psychic-vampires-protect-yourself-video/ http://yournewswire.com/are-you-being-attacked-by-psychic-va...
- molecule 10y ago* > Is there any source for this that's less dodgy?* The press-release link doesn't even go to any press release.
- gandarojin 10y agoFrom the article: > […] the press release has been removed and they are not responding when asked if they still plan to release the source code and take the abstract of their final paper to the conference in Kassel, Germany. Edit: That does not mean that this story is not complete horseshit.