You can't be serious. It's using libsodium in one part of the code, so therefore ALL cryptography uses libsodium? You do know that Bitcoin has already switched

You can't be serious. It's using libsodium in one part of the code, so therefore ALL cryptography uses libsodium? You do know that Bitcoin has already switched most of the secp256k1 stuff away from OpenSSL and to libsecp256k1, and ZCash will follow suit? But more importantly than that it uses libsnark for the actual clever bits, which has already been critically broken[1] precisely because it is so new and poorly tested. Even the cryptography in ZeroCash/ZeroCoin is too new to be trusted with a financial system. That is not alarmist, that is practical. Relying on old, established cryptography is precisely why Bitcoin hasn't been trivially broken, and the zk-snarks cryptography will need to go through the same peer-review and refinement process over the next decade or two. [1] https://leastauthority.com/blog/a_bug_in_libsnark.html https://leastauthority.com/blog/a_bug_in_libsnark.html