4 ms·
I wouldn't have minded reading someones process of learning a new design pattern if it wasn't asserting so many things that are silly or flat out wrong during t
by forgottenpass 10y ago
I wouldn't have minded reading someones process of learning a new design pattern if it wasn't asserting so many things that are silly or flat out wrong during the process. That's why I originally wrote, "this is a bad article." I edified that bit out because it detracts from my point unless I take the time to go through and fisk the article.
- mdomans 10y agoWell, I'm more about advertising the lockless programming pattern :) Point out the silly, please, I like it when someone actually makes honest effort to teach me something.
- scott_s 10y agoThe title, mainly. Most readers will take that to mean that you fixed the GIL itself - that is, removed it - rather than are presenting a pattern that avoids it. Your title sets up an adversarial relationship with such readers, because their attitude when they start is going to be "no, you didn't", which will cause them to miss your actual message.
- mdomans 10y agoFair point.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]