3 ms·

If I read it correctly, you can s/DOS/Unix/ and it would still stand, so: no (DOS|Unix) "is Protestant, or even Calvinistic. It allows free interpretation of s

by mtts 17y ago

If I read it correctly, you can s/DOS/Unix/ and it would still stand, so: no (DOS|Unix) "is Protestant, or even Calvinistic. It allows free interpretation of scripture, demands difficult personal decisions, imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user, and takes for granted the idea that not all can achieve salvation. To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself: Far away from the baroque community of revelers, the user is closed within the loneliness of his own inner torment."

riffraff 17y ago
I'd say it stands better. You have to consider the author is of a literary persuasion, and wrote the article in the '94, unix was something obscure to normal people and popularity of free unixish things were years to come.
- teilo 17y ago
  What are you talking about? In 1993 even little blond girls knew Unix. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/
rbanffy 17y ago
> It allows free interpretation of scripture Check > demands difficult personal decisions Not really. Haven't given up anything because of a difficult decision > imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user Not at all. Everything is very simple, from the bottom up. > not all can achieve salvation Why not? Every Unix that runs on a regular PC (or a Mac) is a free download. Chances are you can run some flavour of Unix on your watch. Or toaster. > To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself No way. Running most programs is a point-and-click business. On any modern Unix (such as Solaris, Debian or Fedora), installing a programs is a point-and-click, very app-storish thing. Without the DRM part, of course.
- mtts 17y ago
  > > It allows free interpretation of scripture > Check > > demands difficult personal decisions > Not really. Haven't given up anything because of a difficult decision vim or emacs? KDE or Gnome? decisions, decisions. > > imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user > Not at all. Everything is very simple, from the bottom up. All complex hermeneutics are simple once you're initiated into them. To the outsider, however, Unix is arcane. > > not all can achieve salvation > Why not? Every Unix that runs on a regular PC (or a Mac) is a free download. Chances are you can run some flavour of Unix on your watch. Or toaster. Salvation comes from understanding the system and making it work for you. Merely downloading it is not enough. Unix is user friendly, it's just very picky about who its friends are. > > To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself > No way. Running most programs is a point-and-click business. On any modern Unix (such as Solaris, Debian or Fedora), installing a programs is a point-and-click, very app-storish thing. > Without the DRM part, of course. Configure, Make, Make Install. Remember, this was written in 1994, when point-and-click was still very alien to Unix. (all in good fun, of course)

by mtts 17y ago

riffraff 17y ago

I'd say it stands better. You have to consider the author is of a literary persuasion, and wrote the article in the '94, unix was something obscure to normal people and popularity of free unixish things were years to come.

teilo 17y ago
What are you talking about? In 1993 even little blond girls knew Unix. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107290/

rbanffy 17y ago

> It allows free interpretation of scripture Check > demands difficult personal decisions Not really. Haven't given up anything because of a difficult decision > imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user Not at all. Everything is very simple, from the bottom up. > not all can achieve salvation Why not? Every Unix that runs on a regular PC (or a Mac) is a free download. Chances are you can run some flavour of Unix on your watch. Or toaster. > To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself No way. Running most programs is a point-and-click business. On any modern Unix (such as Solaris, Debian or Fedora), installing a programs is a point-and-click, very app-storish thing. Without the DRM part, of course.

mtts 17y ago
> > It allows free interpretation of scripture > Check > > demands difficult personal decisions > Not really. Haven't given up anything because of a difficult decision vim or emacs? KDE or Gnome? decisions, decisions. > > imposes a subtle hermeneutics upon the user > Not at all. Everything is very simple, from the bottom up. All complex hermeneutics are simple once you're initiated into them. To the outsider, however, Unix is arcane. > > not all can achieve salvation > Why not? Every Unix that runs on a regular PC (or a Mac) is a free download. Chances are you can run some flavour of Unix on your watch. Or toaster. Salvation comes from understanding the system and making it work for you. Merely downloading it is not enough. Unix is user friendly, it's just very picky about who its friends are. > > To make the system work you need to interpret the program yourself > No way. Running most programs is a point-and-click business. On any modern Unix (such as Solaris, Debian or Fedora), installing a programs is a point-and-click, very app-storish thing. > Without the DRM part, of course. Configure, Make, Make Install. Remember, this was written in 1994, when point-and-click was still very alien to Unix. (all in good fun, of course)