I feel like this is a classic example of abusing your knowledge about your product. You gotta account for the fact that users will usually come in having little

I feel like this is a classic example of abusing your knowledge about your product. You gotta account for the fact that users will usually come in having little knowledge about what your product is and will derive that from the functions available on your page. In the previous designs, you look at it and see: - user generated requestst - crowdsourced voting - how easy submitting a request is, and what it entails - the volume of requests you have I see this in the larger context of icons8 and I get the sense that is akin to voting for a feature. This is something I could do, if I wanted. The new design shows me: - Weird titles that may or may not be some sort of request And that's about it. Only five of them. Take that in the context of icons8 and I really can't parse what it means so I would probably just completely ignore it. On the request page, I don't see how approachable the request feature is, so I ignore it. Uservoice does it better.