4 ms·
He said crime. If the son is not appearing in front of the judge, then the judge's rulings don't benefit the son in any way. If you are arguing the judge's rul
by joshuaheard 10y ago
He said crime.
If the son is not appearing in front of the judge, then the judge's rulings don't benefit the son in any way. If you are arguing the judge's ruling is somehow affecting the reputation of the court and attracting cases, the lawyers know it is only that judge, unless you are implying some sort of conspiracy among the federal judges to be patent troll-friendly.
- knorker 10y agoI'm not arguing that. HE appears to be though.