> If an app saves me $1000/yr in headache, I'd prefer to spend $30/yr on a subscription rather than lose the app entirely because the developers can't keep the

> If an app saves me $1000/yr in headache, I'd prefer to spend $30/yr on a subscription rather than lose the app entirely because the developers can't keep the lights on. Sounds like Apple is still too incompetent to care about backwards compatibility. In a reasonable world, stuff running locally on your device would keep working, regardless of what happened to the original developers.