7 ms·
Doesn't appear to work with custom domains.
by tvanantwerp 10y ago
Doesn't appear to work with custom domains.
- davis_m 10y agoI would hope not. If Github could generate valid SSL certs for random domains, something would be very broken.
- nileshtrivedi 10y agoIt would just request LetsEncrypt to generate those certs and then prove the "ownership" (more like "control") of those domains by whatever method LetsEncrypt wants (.well-known perhaps?).
- Nullabillity 10y agoYup, .well-known should be pretty simple for them to implement.
- atonse 10y agoProbably in the works? SNI should make this pretty easy now, right? Maybe GH doesn't want the responsibility of hosting everyone's private keys.
- minimaxir 10y agoFrom the documentation: > HTTPS is not supported for GitHub Pages using custom domains. Not unsurprising, but unfortunate.
- travjones 10y agoCloudflare's free plan includes one-click SSL for custom domains. That's what I use for my github pages sites.
- kevincox 10y agoAlthough it doesn't validate the backend certificate.
- jsingleton 10y agoIn some cases it doesn't even connect with TLS due to some connection issue with GitHub / fastly and you need to set it to flexible (no encryption). I wonder if this new forced HTTPS redirect will change/break that? I haven't quite worked out the rules yet but some GH pages allow full TLS on CF (but not strict cert validation obviously) and some require flexible. I think org pages need flexible (plain HTTP) but project ones support HTTPS (if on a subdomain)? This update may change all that so will need to experiment again. If it does break things then any new sites after the 15th may not be able to be made to work. If using a CF page rule or HSTS headers to permanently redirect to HTTPS then this could be a problem.
- Artemis2 10y agoIf that's what you are talking about, you can select "Full (strict)" in the SSL options to enforce origin certificate validation. https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200170416-What-do-the-SSL-options-mean- https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200170416-W...
- ajhit406 10y agoWe're working on a static site hosting service called PubStorm (https://www.pubstorm.com https://www.pubstorm.com) that allows SSL on custom domains. It's free; we're also working on some powerful features that will set it apart from gh-pages. http://help.pubstorm.com/command-reference/storm-ssl-set/ http://help.pubstorm.com/command-reference/storm-ssl-set/
- tdkl 10y agoI'm still using kloudsec for this [1] , they presented themselves on HN sometime last year. [1] https://kloudsec.com/github-pages/new https://kloudsec.com/github-pages/new
- koolba 10y ago> Doesn't appear to work with custom domains. Do you have any idea how TLS actually works? If this worked out of the box for custom domains, then GitHub would need to be able to impersonate those domains. At the very least you'd need a way to upload a private key/cert combo that they could server in response to an SNI request. Given the sheer number of sites that they host (every user effectively has a custom GitHub pages page) that's not really feasible though. Hence only support for *.github.io as that only requires a single wildcard cert.
- detaro 10y ago> Do you have any idea how TLS actually works? If this worked out of the box for custom domains, then GitHub would need to be able to impersonate those domains. If you redirect your domain to my webserver, I can get a certificate for it. E.g. from Let's Encrypt. Wordpress.com uses that and offers SSL certificates to "million-plus"[0] blogs with custom domains. It's certainly doable at scale, although I totally understand it not having priority for GitHub (esp if it doesn't fit their current technical setup). [0] https://en.blog.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/https-everywhere-encryption-for-all-wordpress-com-sites/ https://en.blog.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/https-everywhere-en...