3 ms·
His interpretation is how it should be read in English. It may be not how it should have been written. > 78% of black kids had parents who grew up in the top t
by Camillo 10y ago
His interpretation is how it should be read in English. It may be not how it should have been written.
> 78% of black kids had parents who grew up in the top three levels and moved down at least one.
Let B = all black kids;
BT = black kids who had parents who grew up in the top three levels;
BD = black kids who(se parents) moved down at least one level
The only way that sentence can be interpreted in English is:
|BT ∩ BD| / |B| = 78%
If what they wanted to say was:
|BT ∩ BD| / |BT| = 78%
Then the way to say that in English would have been:
> Of the black kids whose parents grew up in the top three levels, 78% moved down at least one.
- Timothee 10y agoYou're right. Somehow it made sense to me when reading the article, but reading your comment I see how it doesn't make sense as stated. I probably implied the "who" since there was no way to have a group qualified by two conditions like these end up so high. (regardless of totals of the two percentages)