3 ms·
I would not call GPL2/3 as a BSD variant in any way... BSD is permissive; GPL2/3 are strong copyleft. Unless you have a VERY lax definition of "variant" grin E
by jimjag 10y ago
I would not call GPL2/3 as a BSD variant in any way... BSD is permissive; GPL2/3 are strong copyleft. Unless you have a VERY lax definition of "variant" grin
EDIT: Thx for the clarification!
- cm3 10y agoI didn't say that, but I can see how you'd interpret it this way, if you consider the parent comment. "as is" was referring to "understood". Sorry for the missing context.