3 ms·
Just because the garbage collector is optional and the slightly higher emphasis on performance. Also the way it compiles to C. I have using Nim to program a m
by Symmetry 10y ago
Just because the garbage collector is optional and the slightly higher emphasis on performance. Also the way it compiles to C. I have using Nim to program a microcontroller on my todo list but I'm not sure how I'd go about doing that in Go. It's weird though because Nim is certainly more expressive than Go is and usually that goes with being higher level.
- michaelcampbell 10y ago> Nim is certainly more expressive than Go is and usually that goes with being higher level. Yes, I think this is what's driving my gut feel. Go feels quite ... hammer-y. Explicit iterators, very few "niceties", etc.