5 ms·
Couldn't Google offer defense in such cases for its users? Every case is the same so it shouldn't even be that expensive (I guess, IANAL), and it would discoura
by comboy 10y ago
Couldn't Google offer defense in such cases for its users? Every case is the same so it shouldn't even be that expensive (I guess, IANAL), and it would discourage future cases because the troll would know he will have to fight against Google.
- oddevan 10y agoI do feel like when a similar thing happened with the iOS App Store (app devs sued for using in-app purchases), Apple tried to insert itself into the case saying that all the technology used was theirs.
- rhino369 10y agoYea they could in multiple ways. They could sue to the troll for a declaratory judgement of invalidity and non infringement. Or they just indemnify their app stor developers for any patent liability caused by using their product.
- ikeboy 10y ago>Or they just indemnify their app stor developers for any patent liability caused by using their product. What about actual patent violations?
- matthewmacleod 10y agoIANAL, but I don't think there's a reason they couldn't indemnify against patent lawsuits regarding the distribution of applications through their services, while not indemnifying for patent violations in the applications themselves.
- anthonybsd 10y ago>their product "Their" in this case being "Google Play" product and any liability arising from the use of thereof.
- tommoor 10y agoGood guy Google should definitely be stepping in here
- droidist2 10y agoI won't hold my breath
- Shivetya 10y agoI guess I am stupid, why isn't Google the defendant, other than the fact they have too much money. This is like being sued for shopping at the wrong store.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- vermontdevil 10y agoBecause it's easier to make money going after small business knowing these business can't afford a lawsuit. One of these troll companies made $30 million a year doing this and they are even listed on the stock exchange!!
- SZJX 10y agoWhich listed company is that though
- developer2 10y agoThe problem is that the "patent" (fucking loose term of the word for something that should never have been allowed to be filed) is about the use of the code in question. It's not the App Store that is supposedly infringing, it's the use of the App Store. What a joke.
- brandonm64 10y agoDoesn't Google use the Play Store to distribute their own apps like Sheets, Docs, Drive etc.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- angry-hacker 10y agoYes but they are not going to sue Google, that is the problem
- rwhitman 10y agoOr at least they could join with some other companies to pool money towards a software trade association with real teeth that we can rely on to represent our industry's interests when it's under attack like this. It's appalling how limp this business is when it comes to demonstrating political muscle