Please explain in another way how it lacks entirely of meaning, because your current explanation is essentially lacking entirely of meaning. How does my right

Please explain in another way how it lacks entirely of meaning, because your current explanation is essentially lacking entirely of meaning. How does my right to free expression require a state entity? That implies that right is provided for by the state entity. That's not how it works. Here's an example of how a non-state entity can violate your right to free expression with the state's approval; you start to say something I don't like, I punch you in the face to shut you up. You try again and I punch you again. Now imagine a police officer standing right next to me watching me do it.