I think I've done things in most well known programming languages that are quite far from basic - from dynamically typed languages up to static typed functional

I think I've done things in most well known programming languages that are quite far from basic - from dynamically typed languages up to static typed functional languages. And I'm not a fan of dynamic typed languages. But I still stand behind my opinion from the parent post: Go's type system is quite primitive, but in combination with the typical way of doing things there it is sufficient for most cases. Whereas other languages need generics a lot more, especially functional languages where monadic types are often used or languages that don't provide builtin list and dictionary types.