3 ms·

those are some strong assumptions. people don't start companies to serve others, and if by any chance they won't lose money but actually earn something that wou

those are some strong assumptions. people don't start companies to serve others, and if by any chance they won't lose money but actually earn something that would be nice. maybe that's the world you would like to see, and maybe one day we will have it, but it's not the world we currently live in. why is it so hard for some to accept that money is, overall, by far the strongest motivation force out there? Remove it, and >95% of population will not show up for their crappy work next day. it might not be the best motivator overall and has some drawbacks, but it works so far surprisingly well and we came to this situation by long evolution.

Angostura 10y ago
> why is it so hard for some to accept that money is, overall, by far the strongest motivation force out there? Because the evidence is circumstantial at best. Money, is of course important. But the strongest motivator? Not for many people.
- saiya-jin 10y ago
  ok, then do that test of removing salary, indefinitely. since it's not the strongest motivator, maybe secondary one, most would still come, right? now how many would show up next day?
  - tremon 10y ago
    Basic income is a great way to test that, yes.
  - arcticfox 10y ago
    I agree that taking extremes is a useful tool, but this isn't the best example. What if you took away 100% of people's time off? No weekends, no evenings? Nobody is coming back to that either.