4 ms·
Perhaps, but they also marched through the lobbies to enable a lot of genuinely regressive policies to pass, notably Gove's education "reforms". For example, t
by Doctor_Fegg 10y ago
Perhaps, but they also marched through the lobbies to enable a lot of genuinely regressive policies to pass, notably Gove's education "reforms".
For example, the LibDem manifesto for 2010 promised to "Switch traffic from road to rail by investing in local rail improvements, such as opening closed rail lines and adding extra tracks, paid for by cutting the major roads budget." [1]
What actually happened to the major roads budget? Well, come 2013, the coalition was embarking upon a massive programme of road-building, proudly trumpeted by Danny Alexander (LibDem chief secretary to the Treasury) as "the greatest investment in our roads since the 1970s". [2] That's not compromise, that's a 180° U-turn on your manifesto commitments. Meanwhile, actual rail reopenings were happening in Scotland thanks to the SNP, and in Wales thanks to Labour, but not in England.
So, no thank you. I had voted LibDem in 2012 and at every general election since the age of 18. Not in 2015 and not again.
[1] http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/ge10/man/parties/libdem_manifesto_2010.pdf http://www.politicsresources.net/area/uk/ge10/man/parties/li...
[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-by-chief-secretary-to-the-treasury-danny-alexander-investing-in-britains-future https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-by-chief-secre...