3 ms·
It looks like they are comparing (in the chart) throughput on each of their file formats in bytes, rather than records. So, they are slower than HDF5, but eat u
by frankmcsherry 10y ago
It looks like they are comparing (in the chart) throughput on each of their file formats in bytes, rather than records. So, they are slower than HDF5, but eat up more resources doing so (which I think is meant to suggest they are leaving less to waste).