3 ms·

> lately… Lately?

• busterarm 10y ago
  Well played, but in the public eye. I think the fact that they completely invented a fictitious science to prosecute cases should have brought serious investigation and televised congressional hearings with daily news coverage... ...but nope. Scrap it and start over.
  • Consultant32452 10y ago
    I'm a little behind, what fictitious science is this?
    • RickS 10y ago
      not the OP, but my guess: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-forensic-hair-matches-in-nearly-all-criminal-trials-for-decades/2015/04/18/39c8d8c6-e515-11e4-b510-962fcfabc310_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/fbi-overstated-fo... >The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.
• B1FF_PSUVM 10y ago
  Malcontents have been griping for over 50 years now ... e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doorbell_Rang https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doorbell_Rang