3 ms·
One difference is that you wouldn't be morally condemned, and perhaps imprisoned, for setting CPU registers to a state the neural net was programmed to avoid.
by catawbasam 10y ago
One difference is that you wouldn't be morally condemned, and perhaps imprisoned, for setting CPU registers to a state the neural net was programmed to avoid.
Also, the neural net evolves to meet an objective -- a purpose -- bestowed upon it by an outside power. Do you believe this is true of humans too?
- Houshalter 10y ago>One difference is that you wouldn't be morally condemned, and perhaps imprisoned, for setting CPU registers to a state the neural net was programmed to avoid. Of course you should be though. At least if we are asserting the neural net was advanced enough to be sufficiently human like. Torturing simulations of humans is no different than torturing actual humans. >Also, the neural net evolves to meet an objective -- a purpose -- bestowed upon it by an outside power. Do you believe this is true of humans too? The neural net serves humans the same way humans serve evolution.