4 ms·
>he specifically said "consciousness". Which is a confused word. He can't give any solid definition to it We can't give solid definitions for anything without
by aninhumer 10y ago
>he specifically said "consciousness". Which is a confused word. He can't give any solid definition to it
We can't give solid definitions for anything without ultimately referencing some shared baseline of experience. So unless you're saying you don't experience qualia/conciousness, then it's as well defined as anything else is.
>We would know exactly why people are saying they feel "conscious" or "blegness".
But that still wouldn't explain the experience itself.
- Houshalter 10y ago>So unless you're saying you don't experience qualia/conciousness I don't see any evidence anyone experiences this, including myself. It's just nonsense. >But that still wouldn't explain the experience itself. How would it not? If you know exactly what causes people to say they "experience" there is no need to explain anything else.