>The concept is used as an argument against physicalism, I don't see it as an argument against anything, it's just an interesting philosophical hypothetical ma

>The concept is used as an argument against physicalism, I don't see it as an argument against anything, it's just an interesting philosophical hypothetical made plausible by our inability to observe conciousness. I could certainly see an argument that they're not that interesting on a more practical level (since by definition, we can never apply any conclusions made about them) but I don't understand the suggestion that they're logically incoherent.