4 ms·
I believe somewhere in there the judges have the ability to ask questions and determine things on their own despite what either party wants or desires. It's the
by talmand 10y ago
I believe somewhere in there the judges have the ability to ask questions and determine things on their own despite what either party wants or desires. It's the whole point in having a judge. If everything could be decided solely on evidence presented without question then people are not required for most cases, just an elaborate evidence decision tree is needed.
- jeffmould 10y agoCompletely agree. However, when only one party is there to answer questions, the judge is left with whether to believe or not believe what the plaintiff is saying. If that is the case, the reverse would also have to apply. Currently if the plaintiff doesn't show up the case is dismissed. If only one party is required though, now the defendant is left to argue why he/she is not guilty. That doesn't work either.