3 ms·
>there were frequently people way over the speed limit I agree that this is bad, but we don't have to appeal to safety or illegality to oppose this kind of thr
by gerbilly 10y ago
>there were frequently people way over the speed limit
I agree that this is bad, but we don't have to appeal to safety or illegality to oppose this kind of through traffic.
I think as a resident of the street it's reasonable to expect drivers to stick to the main roads and leave your neighborhood alone.
I'm a fairly tolerant person, but a car driving down a street causes many unpleasant side effects: noise and pollution being the major ones. It also inconveniences pedestrians[1], kids, cats and squirrels who want to cross the road.
How would you enjoy sitting on the porch of your home if there were suddenly a river of traffic on the street?
[1] It bugs me how in North America pedestrians are seen as inconveniencing a driver if they are crossing the road, but not the other way around. We have our priorities the wrong way around.
- JoeAltmaier 10y agoAs traffic density increases due to inevitable population rises, this first-world claim of "its my street and I want it quiet!" will have to give way to practicality. It takes years and $Millions to upgrade major roadways for ever-higher loads. In my area the rich manage to get speed bumps, intersection blocks and one-way signs installed to protect their extra-special selves from the world. I kind of resent it.