3 ms·
>to an advanced civilization that a nuclear radioactive waste dump may well be of value. Actually it has value to our civilization, because much of the low-gra
by someguydave 10y ago
>to an advanced civilization that a nuclear radioactive waste dump may well be of value.
Actually it has value to our civilization, because much of the low-grade uranium "waste" could be put into breeder reactors and turned into plutonium - and reused as nuclear fuel.
Read about it here: https://www.withouthotair.com/c24/page_163.shtml https://www.withouthotair.com/c24/page_163.shtml
- greglindahl 10y agoIt (this particular plutonium isotope) is also really useful for building bombs. (edit: made it more clear what I meant)
- danieltillett 10y agoYes. I would tend to suggest that it would be better to hide the waste very deep and destroy all knowledge of where it was buried.
- someguydave 10y agoDo you really think that option is feasible? Even the ancient Romans were unsuccessful at damning the memories of their enemies.
- danieltillett 10y agoHow do you know this? We know almost nothing about anyone or anything that happened during Roman times - the fact that a few scraps have survived is hardly an indication that most knowledge deliberately destroyed managed to escape.
- someguydave 10y agoWell, there's this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domitian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domitian re: damnatio memoriae "Yet the order of the Senate was only partially executed in Rome, and wholly disregarded in most of the provinces outside Italy." I think it's possible that a similar effect would happen with attempting the same thing to the knowledge of nuclear fission...
- someguydave 10y agoYes but is also could be used to supply the entire world with Western levels of electric power.
- greglindahl 10y agoThat's one of many ways that you could do that, yes.
- ageofwant 10y agoThose other ways do not get rid of a potentially serious environmental contaminant. Or do you prefer if those "waste dumps" remain unused and potentially dangerous. It both serves as a very valuable source of rare energy and at the same time gets rid of the "waste" of old redundant processes, what's not to like ?
- someguydave 10y agoI suspect that Mr. Lindahl is against nuclear power for ideological - not practical - reasons.