4 ms·
It's important to note that not all these debates take the shape of "homeowners vs. commuters." The article used Clinton Street in Portland as an example. Who
by enoch_r 10y ago
It's important to note that not all these debates take the shape of "homeowners vs. commuters."
The article used Clinton Street in Portland as an example. Who was upset that Clinton street was being used as cut-through by impatient drivers? Homeowners along Clinton were among those calling for change, but the loudest voices calling for diverters to reduce through-traffic were people who commuted or traveled along Clinton through methods other than cars. People who biked or walked down Clinton were used to it being a pleasant, low-speed, low-volume road where they could ride with their kids without fear. "Neighborhood greenways" like Clinton make up a huge portion of Portland's bike infrastructure, and people using it to escape traffic on the major arterial 2 blocks north were destroying that.
The roads don't belong to the people who live on them, but they don't just belong to drivers, either.
- steveax 10y agoYep, same thing happening in my 'hood (Sellwood) on Umatilla. With the Sellwood bridge construction the traffic on Tacoma has been worse and drivers have been dipping down to Umatilla to avoid it and cutting back in right before the bridge. It's a mess and especially galling as the vast majority of traffic over the Sellwood bridge originates in Clackamas county where the residents were too cheap to pitch in $5/year (yes, per year) to help pay for the new bridge.