4 ms·
Coming from Haskell, I kind of dismissed it on the basis of missing a construct like interfaces/protocols/traits/type-classes, and started checking out purescri
by akst 10y ago
Coming from Haskell, I kind of dismissed it on the basis of missing a construct like interfaces/protocols/traits/type-classes, and started checking out purescript instead which is closer to Haskell. Eventually stopped using purescript due to some unbearable compile times (in purescript's defence it was early on in it's development, and it's still pre 1.0).
All that said, I'd probably check out elm now only because I've heard good things about it's developer experience.
- hoodunit 10y agoPureScript compile times have been quite good for me in the last two versions or so, so there has been some improvement there.