>If that's the version you tried No, it was a couple years ago. >compared to Haskell (which is also pure) But which has both a real type system and a useful

>If that's the version you tried No, it was a couple years ago. >compared to Haskell (which is also pure) But which has both a real type system and a useful set of base libraries. The lack of basic stuff like monads is really painful in elm.