5 ms·

For what it's worth, generating random values is slightly easier with the introduction of subscriptions in 0.17. If that's the version you tried, it would be ni

by spuz 10y ago

For what it's worth, generating random values is slightly easier with the introduction of subscriptions in 0.17. If that's the version you tried, it would be nice to see why you think Elm is unnecessarily complex compared to Haskell (which is also pure) when it comes to generating random values.

MustardTiger 10y ago
>If that's the version you tried No, it was a couple years ago. >compared to Haskell (which is also pure) But which has both a real type system and a useful set of base libraries. The lack of basic stuff like monads is really painful in elm.