https://www.google.com/search?q=slippery%20slope%20is%20not%20a%20fallacy&rct=j https://www.google.com/search?q=slippery%20slope%20is%20not%... The "slippery s

https://www.google.com/search?q=slippery%20slope%20is%20not%20a%20fallacy&rct=j https://www.google.com/search?q=slippery%20slope%20is%20not%... The "slippery slope" is not a logical fallacy, but calling it one is a great rhetorical measure to shut someone up if you don't like their argument. Similarly, the argument you cite above, if properly applied, is valid. How about McCarthyism and such campaigns. You obviously have to protect our precious bodily fluids. It is as easy to frame this as a way to put Jake in the framing of one of the last remaining purity taboos, framed as an anonymous anarchist group. How can an anarchist advocate of anonymity object? Except that an anarchist would contract to confront a problem with all aggrieved parties in the open, not like this witch hunt. So these people are not acting like anarchists, they are just ducking state mechanisms and summoning a mob. This is what puts anarchy in ill repute with the general public. It's not what anarchy calls for in these cases. So I am trying to act like a responsible anarchist and picking up his advocacy. If someone from that crowd wants to pick up their advocacy and Jake actually authorizes representation outside a court (which he hasn't, btw) maybe we can have a moot. Otherwise, this is a mob.