3 ms·
As quoted, "Edens acknowledged the amount is "seemingly high" and the judgment "may seem extreme for the breach of contract for the purchase of a printer." But
by sgustard 10y ago
As quoted, "Edens acknowledged the amount is "seemingly high" and the judgment "may seem extreme for the breach of contract for the purchase of a printer." But he wrote that he's constrained by how the Supreme Court had previously interpreted a state trial rule, called Rule 36, which sets the 30-day deadline for responding to requests for admissions."
- TrickzOnU 10y agoArent such notices supposed to be handed in person via a process server? How could the person be held liable for a default judgement without being personally handed court documents?