> Like I said, completely out of touch. Sigh. Is that all you do; respond by insults and innuendo? How about some proof... if you have any. > You are not goin

> Like I said, completely out of touch. Sigh. Is that all you do; respond by insults and innuendo? How about some proof... if you have any. > You are not going to grow enough to sustain yourselves on 200 square feet, 200 sq ft is enough to provide fish and vegetables for 8 people, indefinitely. This only works when using aquaponics with combined plants and tilapia. See more here: http://portablefarms.com/2016/feed-your-family-aquaponics-system/ http://portablefarms.com/2016/feed-your-family-aquaponics-sy... http://upriser.com/posts/this-aquaponic-farm-holds-20-000-lbs-of-fish-and-grows-70-000-vegetables-in-a-1-4-acre-area http://upriser.com/posts/this-aquaponic-farm-holds-20-000-lb... > and what ever you do grow will require more resources than growing that same amount on an industrial agribusiness scale. No. That wasn't your initial argument. Cost is your only argument, and one I have already conceded. What is the cost of food security? What are the costs of having better tasting food than one can buy at the store? I've given other comparisons as well, none of which are about cost. Or what about the next drought? It kills 80% of the crops. Those nice closed-loop hydroponics are immune to those effects.