3 ms·
Why wouldn't you use azure instead?
by logical42 10y ago
Why wouldn't you use azure instead?
- lallysingh 10y agoIf I were to guess, to avoid having to go through the meetings and internal bureaucracy for it. It'd literally be cheaper (after counting in person-hours of time) to just pay for an external vendor.
- kevinstubbs 10y agoThere's no extra meetings or internal bureaucracy for using Azure internally. It's painless to get an internal subscription for Azure that can be used by your team.
- mooreds 10y agoPerhaps that was not the case in 2013?
- sargun 10y agoDid you try using Azure to run Linux workloads "at scale" (100+ nodes) in 2013?