3 ms·
"number of characters per line" made sense when we all used text-based monitors with a fixed number of characters on the screen. Nowadays, most people are usin
by outworlder 10y ago
"number of characters per line" made sense when we all used text-based monitors with a fixed number of characters on the screen.
Nowadays, most people are using graphic displays, at a very high resolution, with beautiful, mathematically described fonts, which can be resized at will. So why are we restricting ourselves to an arbitrary number?
80 seems too low, no matter if you are writing javascript callbacks or writing Scheme code. Or doing python with a 4 space indentation. But it may be too much for older folks.
I feel that the reason we have computers is to deal with this kind of stuff, so why can't we do whatever we want and have the computer display the way we like?
- grkvlt 10y agoHas anyone ever designed a visual editor or IDE where the syntactic and semantic elements were differentiated using font SIZE as well as the usual colouring and face variation (bold, italic, underline) we normally get? I could imagine having class names in a larger, heading type font size, for example. Code folding could be used, with attributes like access modifiers aligned underneath. Code blocks could be displayed as actual boxes, with borders and fills?