4 ms·

I don't think there's enough evidence to say that we necessarily couldn't crush those insurgencies with drones. As far as I can tell, the US has (reasonably, h

I don't think there's enough evidence to say that we necessarily couldn't crush those insurgencies with drones. As far as I can tell, the US has (reasonably, humanely)[1] pulled its punches considerably over the last fifteen years. [1] to the extent that any war can have these descriptors slapped on them. War is hell, The US has done inhumane stuff, I don't think they did as much as for example I think they did in Vietnam.

jonstokes 10y ago
Then you're left to argue that the US military has pulled its punches on the Taliban, but they're really gonna take the gloves off if they get turned against their fellow citizens. Good luck with that.
- ethbro 10y ago
  That doesn't seem too unreasonable. The former is a conflict half a world away for (at best) geopolitical goals, the later would be an existential threat.
- mikeash 10y ago
  The whole scenario is predicated on some horrible tyrant taking control of the US. Why wouldn't the gloves come off in that case?
  - pkinsky 10y ago
    Because said tyrant wishes to avoid a coup by the armed forces/defections to the rebels/etc?