3 ms·
> he was perfectly able to explain (using comedy) why he believed something without implying that you are lesser for disagreeing with it. Not completely. If th
by monksy 10y ago
> he was perfectly able to explain (using comedy) why he believed something without implying that you are lesser for disagreeing with it.
Not completely. If there was a subculture that he didn't get along with, he'd feel completely at home with completely steam rolling them. (I.e. Dungeons and Dragons) What I liked about Colbert is that he would try to jump into the culture and make absurd jokes with the community.