Another point with the hubris - why go the most complicated thing - continuous, in-body sensing , instead of half/quarter-yearly blood testing ? Sure it's somew

Another point with the hubris - why go the most complicated thing - continuous, in-body sensing , instead of half/quarter-yearly blood testing ? Sure it's somewhat better, but not that big of a deal, especially since you lose a lot in accuracy, cost, complexity, etc. It's also actually something we see in the story of theranos, and it's quite puzzling - as almost as if you need to sell the project to the public and investors the same way you sell some mobile game.