6 ms·
If it violated the licence, the author has legal recourse. If not: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/10/19/the-point http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/1
by RyanMcGreal 17y ago
If it violated the licence, the author has legal recourse. If not: http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/10/19/the-point http://diveintomark.org/archives/2009/10/19/the-point
- bad_user 17y agoIt violated the license ... if you read the first link, the author claims that the individual deleted copyright references of him and of plugin contributors, taking credit for the work. The author also said he doesn't have the money or the time for legal recourse. I also don't fully agree with Mark ... there is an unwritten rule in any society ... when people are being nice giving you stuff for free / helping you out, don't piss on their lawn ;) In real-life when this happens, you just slam the door on his face next time. This also happened here, but unfortunately because of the easy means of redistribution, the author just slammed the door on everybody.