> OK, what would you do, then? Something like this, perhaps: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-June/041112.html https://lists.torproject.org

> OK, what would you do, then? Something like this, perhaps: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-June/041112.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-June/04... TL;DR: neutral court of arbitration hears the case with all the private details; does not disclose those private details; hears defense etc etc.; makes a judgement; everyone else acknowledges and adheres to that judgement. Disclaimers: (1) not that there aren't problems and points of weakness with this approach, of course; (2) personally I am very much inclined to trust what Andrea Shepard and Nick Farr say - I'm just saying that some separation of powers and being careful with smear campaigns (note, I don't think that what Nick Farr said is anything akin to smear, though, and I applause his courage here) may do more good in the end.