3 ms·
That approach is not compatible with making users explicitly agree with the new privacy policy that basically allows Microsoft to access your data. So it might
by Hermel 10y ago
That approach is not compatible with making users explicitly agree with the new privacy policy that basically allows Microsoft to access your data. So it might have been the corporate lawyers that demanded this to be an upgrade that requires explicit consent.
- captainmuon 10y agoTrue. But most of the changes to the privacy policy are to make Cortana work, which in the current state works like crap for me anyway. If they'd not shove that into their OS, but make it a separate product (that actually worked and not just opened Bing all the time), people would be more willing to sign their terms (and might even pay for it).
- Piskvorrr 10y ago"Requires explicit consent" my ass. Perhaps "well, we should require explicit consent, but what would happen, for example, if a bug went through the QA unnoticed and upgraded the boxes anyway?" (Highly hypothetical: my bet is still on incompetence)